• Home
  • Courses
    Browse by Agency
    • DOT (49CFR)
    • IATA
    • IMDG
    • ADR
    • TDG
    • RCRA
    • OSHA
    • FMCSA
    • DOT (49CFR)
    • IATA
    • IMDG
    • ADR
    • TDG
    • RCRA
    • OSHA
    • FMCSA
    Browse by Type
    • Non-Bulk
    • Bulk
    • International
    • Lithium Battery
    • Non-Bulk
    • Bulk
    • International
    • Lithium Battery
    About our Training
    • Delivery Methods
    • Renewal Training
    • Certifications
    • Delivery Methods
    • Renewal Training
    • Certifications
  • Professional Services
    • hazMAX™ Portal
    • Carrier Management System
    • Rail Services
    • Audits Services
    • Compliance Programs
    • Learning Management System
    • LMS Modules
  • About Us
  • News
  • Contact
    Have a question?
    412-249-1111
    info@learnhazmat.com
    Transportation Compliance Associates, Inc
    • Home
    • Courses
      Browse by Agency
      • DOT (49CFR)
      • IATA
      • IMDG
      • ADR
      • TDG
      • RCRA
      • OSHA
      • FMCSA
      • DOT (49CFR)
      • IATA
      • IMDG
      • ADR
      • TDG
      • RCRA
      • OSHA
      • FMCSA
      Browse by Type
      • Non-Bulk
      • Bulk
      • International
      • Lithium Battery
      • Non-Bulk
      • Bulk
      • International
      • Lithium Battery
      About our Training
      • Delivery Methods
      • Renewal Training
      • Certifications
      • Delivery Methods
      • Renewal Training
      • Certifications
    • Professional Services
      • hazMAX™ Portal
      • Carrier Management System
      • Rail Services
      • Audits Services
      • Compliance Programs
      • Learning Management System
      • LMS Modules
    • About Us
    • News
    • Contact

      Uncategorized

      • Home
      • Blog
      • Uncategorized
      • Potential Landfill Regulation Changes Spark Concerns

      Potential Landfill Regulation Changes Spark Concerns

      • Categories Uncategorized
      • Date October 1, 2014

      On September 17, 2014, both the Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA) and the National Waste & Recycling Association (NW&RA), released comments regarding the new EPA standards found within the Standards of Performance for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.

      It is important to note that the NW&RA and SWANA represent the private and municipal/public waste and recycling industries in the US. Both departments are concerned about the affects of the new ruling, which has sparked joint comments from both of them respectively.

      Sharon H. Kneiss, the NW&RA president and CEO, and John Skinner, Ph.D., SWANA executive director and CEO, sent joint comments to the EPA regarding the new unnecessary regulations.

      Their statements concluded that “Landfills are a critical component in the spectrum of waste management options in the United States, but the latest round of regulations proposed by the EPA create significant, undue burden..” and that the “EPA’s proposed new rule and cost analysis substantially underestimates the number of existing landfills that will be affected.”

      It is apparent then, that many in both the private and public sector are not happy with these proposed regulations. Their statements reflect the inefficiencies that these regulations may cause, along with the costs and potential violations without providing any genuine environmental benefit.

      Unforeseen Side-effects

      The joint comments from the NW&RA and SWANA, highlight the lack of research that the EPA conducted prior to releasing their new proposed landfill standards. For example, the financial impact on current landfill and recycling plants can hamper modifications to facilities as well as any progress already made. In fact, the EPA’s data only included costs on landfills opening in 2014 and later, which overlooks a large number of facilities.

      The cost of adhering to the EPA’s new regulations could potential reach millions of dollars, especially when it comes to expanding and upgrading infrastructure. This added financial burden could cause plants to shut down, leaving few options for the public to choose from.

      The EPA will not release its final ruling until next year, so it is hoped that these comments could possibly alter the final regulation standards to better suit the economic climate.

      If you or your team handle or work with hazardous waste or waste management, Transportation Complaince Associates, Inc. offers complete RCRA Training solutions. Contact us today to learn more!

      • Share:
      author avatar
      David Phenicie

      Previous post

      Final Rule Released Regarding Lithium Battery Regulations
      October 1, 2014

      Next post

      Could the New PHMSA Proposed Regulations Make Business Easier?
      October 19, 2014

      You may also like

      EPA Proposed Rule Withdrawal (1)
      EPA Proposed Rule Withdrawal
      11 July, 2025
      EPA Final Rule SNUR
      EPA: Final Rule Alert
      13 June, 2025
      _EPA Interim Final Rule
      EPA Interim Final Rule
      14 May, 2025

      Search

      Recent Blogs

      • UPDATE: OSHA’s Proposed Heat Injury and Illness Rule September 26, 2025
      • Sneak Peek: OSHA TOP 10 Violations 2025 September 19, 2025
      • 67Th Edition Significant Changes and Amendments (2026) September 5, 2025
      • Comment Period Extensions August 27, 2025
      • US DOL: Updates Penalty and Debt Collection Procedures July 25, 2025
      412-249-1111
      info@learnhazmat.com
      Carnegie Business Park

      800 N. Bell Ave, Ste 130
      Carnegie, Pa 15106

      Facebook-f Linkedin Twitter

      LearnHazmat.com Copyright 2006 - Present
      hazMAX Is a registered trademark

      • Privacy
      • Refund Policy
      Back to top
      Purchase Course

      Shopping Cart

      Course Qty Price
      Your cart is empty
      Checkout Now